Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Greg Borenstein sez, "This is a video version of a paper I delivered with Jem Axelrod at the 2009 PAMLA Conference about Project Cybersyn, an early 70s socialist pseudo-internet built by British cyberneticist Stafford Beer in Chile. The video explores how Beer's writing, infographics, and industrial design worked together to create a science fictional narrative of omniscience and ominpotence for Salvador Allende's socialist government."
Free As In Beer: Cybernetic Science Fictions (Thanks, Greg!)
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Just look at it.
Dazzling Banana an electronic Banana peeler

Mortimer Mutated Bear Plush by *Undead-Art* (via Superpunch)
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Yep, you read right! That's FREE shipping on orders of $100 or more. (contiguous US only, not to be combined with other offers). This deal won't last forever, so take advantage of this great offer while you can. Use coupon code ELVES at checkout.

Not sure what to get? Check out all the great gift guides form the Maker Shed!
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Chief Constable Andy Trotter, chairman of Acpo's media advisory group, took the decision to send the warning after growing criticism of the police's treatment of photographers.Police U-turn on photographers and anti-terror laws (Thanks, Mutant Rob!)Writing in today's Independent, he says: "Everyone... has a right to take photographs and film in public places. Taking photographs... is not normally cause for suspicion and there are no powers prohibiting the taking of photographs, film or digital images in a public place."
He added: "We need to make sure that our officers and Police Community Support Officers [PCSOs] are not unnecessarily targeting photographers just because they are going about their business. The last thing in the world we want to do is give photographers a hard time or alienate the public. We need the public to help us.
"Photographers should be left alone to get on with what they are doing. If an officer is suspicious of them for some reason they can just go up to them and have a chat with them - use old-fashioned policing skills to be frank - rather than using these powers, which we don't want to over-use at all."
Section 44 of the Terrorism Act allows the police to stop and search anyone they want, without need for suspicion, in a designated area. The exact locations of many of these areas are kept secret from the public, but are thought to include every railway station in and well-known tourist landmarks thought to be at risk of terrorist attacks...
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
The reason is that next March the National Audit Office (NAO), a public-spending watchdog, is due to publish a report of its own on local efforts to combat drugs. The Home Office says that to have two reports about drugs out at the same time might confuse the public, and for this reason it is going to keep its report under wraps.Transform Drug Policy Foundation: Media Blog: Transform FOI vs Home Office suppression of research - Part V (in The Economist ) (Thanks, Steve!)This is believed to be the first time that a public body has openly refused to release information in order to manage the news better. The department argues that releasing its internal analysis now "risks misinterpretation of the findings of the [NAO] report", because its own analysis is from 2007 and predates the NAO's findings. The argument uses section 36 of the FOI act, which provides a broad exemption for information that could "prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs".
The information commissioner, who polices the FOI act, declined to comment because the case was still open. But his predecessor, Richard Thomas, who stepped down in June, questioned the novel defence. "Certainly my office was always quite sceptical of anything which said publishing information is going to confuse the public. If that's the case, normally you need to put out some extra material alongside it to provide adequate explanation. It's not a reason for withholding something."
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Will Fusion Garage's Chandrasekar "Chandra" Rathakrishnan stick to open sourcing the CrunchPad? Maybe someone can ask at the video call on Monday... Chandra if you're Google alerting this, there's an overview below, so far no one at TechCrunch have replied to our emails... If it's not going to be open source as promised, that's fine - just say it.
SF Biz times... The man whom TechCrunch blog network founder and editor Michael Arrington blamed for killing his CrunchPad hardware project has scheduled a video call with reporters and industry analysts for Monday, according to a Silicon Valley public relations firm.Previously:
Chandrasekar "Chandra" Rathakrishnan, founder and CEO of Fusion Garage, will speak to reporters and demonstrate "the device" both in a video call and in private briefings scheduled for later Monday at the St. Regis Hotel in San Francisco, said Megan Alpers of San Jose-based McGrath/Power Public Relations.
The CrunchPad, named Popular Mechanic's 10 most brilliant products of the year (although it never came out) is not happening. Mike writes -
The entire project self destructed over nothing more than greed, jealousy and miscommunication... I'm enraged, embarrassed, and just...sad.
I bet there's more to this story... Here's what Ladyada who makes hardware thinks...
Although it may seem like an irrelevant point, I'm guessing the price was a big contributor to the project death. Why? because when you say up front (with no experience in hardware/manufacturing design) that you're going to sell it for $x the scramble then becomes "how can each party squeeze margin out?" When theres very little margin, parties are more willing to bluff knowing that they can walk away and there was almost no $ on the table. Hardware has this problem, and I've seen it so many times, that the founder prices the hardware at only a bit (say ~30%) above the parts cost, not realizing the tons of NRE expenses, ballooning BOM, contractor costs, and the hundreds of other ways the price can easily double. Then they're stuck: the investors/contract manufacturer/designer/customer hates them. That leads to abandonment. Please please please, if you decide to do any kind of hardware, add an extra 40% margin on top of whatever you pick. If you don't need it, you can always cut the price later! :)
When there was a lot of buzz about the CrunchPad many curious gadget fans asked me about their "open source" and "open source hardware" tablet. I wasn't sure if it was going to happen, it's expensive, margins are tough, doing hardware is hard. A lot of web commenters said "exactly, this is so easy now" just get some screens, load up linux and have it boot in to a browser, it's a weekend project, DONE!". For folks who do hardware there's more to it than that beyond demo-ware.
I also was worried about the marketing of the CrunchPad said "open source" just to get good will and support, this happens a lot.
Here's what was said...
In the founding July 21, 2008 manifesto "We Want A Dead Simple Web Tablet For $200. Help Us Build It. Michael Arrington wrote: "So let's design it, build a few and then open source the specs so anyone can create them." "If everything works well, we'd then open source the design and software and let anyone build one that wants to."
On the "The End Of The CrunchPad" post Mike writes...
It was so close I could taste it. Two weeks ago we were ready to publicly launch the CrunchPad. The device was stable enough for a demo. It went hours without crashing. We could even let people play with the device themselves - the user interface was intuitive enough that people "got it" without any instructions. And the look of pure joy on the handful of outsiders who had used it made the nearly 1.5 year effort completely worth it.
This sounds like it's in a good spot to open up the designs, right? So as a follow up I've asked if they're going to stick to what they said. I'm hoping they publish something.
I posted my question on TechCrunch...
mike - phil from MAKE magazine here. you said many times that the project was an open source project (the hardware and the software) - where are the files, the schematics, the source code, the PCB files, etc? is it correct to assume that "fusion garage" is not going to release any source or continue this project as an open source (software/hardware project)? if that's the case it seems like "open source" was used again just to get good will and marketing and not really put any value in.I also sent TechCrunch an email directly (12/1/2009 - no reply yet).
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
I had a chance to talk to Kirk about the secrecy of the ACTA agreement. He said the ACTA text would be made public, "when it is finished." I told him it that was too late, and the public wanted the text out now, before it is too late to influence anything.Ambassador Kirk: People would be "walking away from the table" if the ACTA text is made public (via The Command Line)Kirk said he was aware that there were those who wanted the text public, but the issue of transparency was "about as complicated as it can get," and Kirk didn't want people "walking away from the table," which would likely happen if the text was public, he said.
I said that it was untrue that IPR negotiations are normally secret, mentioning as examples that drafts of the other IPR texts, including the proposed WIPO treaty for disabilities and the climate change agreement language on IPR, as well as several drafts of the FTAA text and the 1996 WIPO copyright treaties had been public. Kirk said that ACTA "was different" and the topics being negotiated in ACTA were "more complex."
I brought up to Kirk that the USTR had shown ACTA text to dozens of corporate lobbyists and all of its trading partners in the ACTA negotiation, and the text was only secret from the public. Kirk did say USTR was discussing this issue with the White House and its trading partners, but that was about all he could say at that moment.
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Bethany Halford's column in this week's Chemical & Engineering News drew my attention to BEYONDbones, an official blog from the Houston Museum of Natural Sciences, and particularly to a couple of chemistry-related holiday projects. This page teaches how to make a crystalline ornament from pipe cleaners and saturated borax, and this one, how to use washable markers and a coffee filter to make tie-dye-like paper ornaments based on the principle of paper chromatography.
Read more | Permalink | Comments | Read more articles in Chemistry | Digg this!
Read more of this story at Slashdot.

It's been a while since my last build journal, mostly because the finish takes a few days to apply, and yet another few days to fully cure. I'm just happy it's now done! I want to start building... and printing!
First up, assembling the pulleys. If you purchased a kit, it includes a set of 3D-printed pulleys. This makes the pulleys really easy to assemble. However, there are a few tips and tricks that I'll cover.
First, make sure there are no extra bits of plastic in the pulley opening. If there are, carefully scrape them off with a hobby knife. Next, use one of the screws from the hardware burrito, along with a nut, to help push the bearing into the pulley. Screw the nut onto the bolt about 1/4" and then press the bolt head firmly until the bearing is completely seated. It's a snug fit, but you should be able to press it in fairly easily.
That's it! All the pulleys are assembled. If you are making your own pulleys from laser cut parts, check out this guide. Now it's time to apply a finish to your enclosure.
41 queries. 2.063 seconds